What version control system do you use?
#21
Posted 24 January 2012 - 02:55 PM
#22
Posted 31 January 2012 - 05:40 AM

#24
Posted 04 February 2012 - 01:34 PM
It's insane.
The only valid argument for SVN these days is if you're versioning a lot of binary files, like images.
Mercurial is dead simple:
hg init
hg add
hg status
hg commit -m "message"
You don't even have to push if you're just working locally.
And it's got this Tortoise thing going too: TortoiseHg.
And - in stark contrast to SVN which insist on polluting the entire directory tree with .svn folders, you only have one toplevel .hg directory to deal with.
#26
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:44 AM

www.formcorp.com.au
#28
Posted 18 February 2012 - 08:26 AM

#29
Posted 18 February 2012 - 09:56 AM
#30
Posted 18 February 2012 - 11:35 AM
Wasn't worth it when I checked it out, but that was years ago.
I don't mind using Git if it's only simple stuff.
But for full blown shit, I prefer to use Mercurial.

#31
Posted 01 March 2012 - 12:34 PM
That's C++ developers.
So it seems like web devs are biased towards Git.
Also, a rather small percentage were still using SVN.
I see that it's a bit high here.
That's strange.
#32
Posted 01 March 2012 - 12:45 PM
#33
Posted 01 March 2012 - 12:55 PM

#34
Posted 05 March 2012 - 11:50 AM
#35
Posted 12 March 2012 - 07:57 AM
#37
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:18 AM
#38
Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:50 AM
Also, i use mercurial + bitbucket for all my personal and company projects.
#39
Posted 15 April 2012 - 03:00 PM